Best posts made by Offworlder1
It is a terrible idea and seeing all the examples of this kind of game that either failed hard, or never ended so a new game could finally come out neither fate is good for AC. The best case is if it fails hard and Ubisoft understands the message of "no we do not support or want this garbage, go back to what worked the past 12 plus games in the series".
Ubisoft clearly does not know the phrase "if it ain't broke don't fix it" because if they did they would not be trying this horrible idea for a story driven single player series.
You must be trolling, Odyssey was a far worse game at launch, I am sure most if not everyone remembers the huge backlash that "enemy level scaling" recieved making the game practically unplayable with how not fun or enjoyable it was. I loved Origins and I love Valhalla because they give you tons of options of how you want to play be it [censored] easy or insanely hard.
Odyssey removed that "player choice" and it was not until many updates/patches later that the game was fixed so people who hated that "enemy level scaling" garbage could have more options. I put Odyssey down after 2 days of not liking the game, then 1 year later I started it again and it was finally "worth playing".
Valhalla is a joy day 1, and I am loving it as are many other people, Origins was amazing at launch as well and thankfully the team that made Origins did it right again with Valhalla.