As title.
I feel that Valhalla is way worse than Odyssey in pretty everything.

Landscapes are all the same, ok we are talking about an historical period where there are only countryside,
but what about Asgard?

Asgard is so "lifeless" when compared to the Atlantis of Odyssey.

Combat system is so boring when compared to Odyssey,
ax, perry, ax, repeat.

Skill tree is a caos, abilities can't be mixed in a combo like in Odyssey and you end using always the same abilities.
I used one or two at most during combat.

Too much things on the map, it happen that you spend 30 minutes finding a point on the map and you end finding some pieces of nichel, seriously?
30 minutes for some nichel?

Differently from Odyssey you don't feel the character progression.
There are so few armour set, so few weapons, and you don't feel the character progression.

I'm an AC fanboy, I played all the games launch day since the first AC but this game is so flat when compared to Odyssey and a big disappointment for me.

Guys I need to admit it, I have degree in computer science but I'm not into history.

At school I studied history but we never studied all those historical figures.

I played all the AC games, and this is the first game that teched me so many new historical figures I never heard before.

Pretty glad to know that I'm more ignorant than what I thought and that I'm able to learn something while playing.

Sorry for my ignorance, thank you Ubisoft!!

@asgardian02 they tried to remove all the RPG things that made Valhalla so great.
No need to argue on tastes, I can understand that there are people who prefer a game more RPG oriented and people who prefer a game that is less RPG oriented.

But why do a game that is so long, with so many points of the map if this game is not an RPG at all,
how do you justify 100+ hours if there is no character progession?

I'm at 50 hours of Valhalla, played 150 hours in Odyssey, I really would like to go straight to the end, the game is boring.
Valhalla is a huge step back over Odyssey.

It's a 100+hours game without RPG mechanincs and without the mighty architectures and landscapes we are used in the AC series.
Sincerely in 50 hours I don't even encountered some impactful characters like in Odyssey, Odyssey was full of impactful characters and more history rich.

I really hope that the next AC will be made from the same people of Odyssey, Valhallha I repeat, is a huge step back.

Guys I need to admit it, I have degree in computer science but I'm not into history.

At school I studied history but we never studied all those historical figures.

I played all the AC games, and this is the first game that teched me so many new historical figures I never heard before.

Pretty glad to know that I'm more ignorant than what I thought and that I'm able to learn something while playing.

Sorry for my ignorance, thank you Ubisoft!!

As title.
I feel that Valhalla is way worse than Odyssey in pretty everything.

Landscapes are all the same, ok we are talking about an historical period where there are only countryside,
but what about Asgard?

Asgard is so "lifeless" when compared to the Atlantis of Odyssey.

Combat system is so boring when compared to Odyssey,
ax, perry, ax, repeat.

Skill tree is a caos, abilities can't be mixed in a combo like in Odyssey and you end using always the same abilities.
I used one or two at most during combat.

Too much things on the map, it happen that you spend 30 minutes finding a point on the map and you end finding some pieces of nichel, seriously?
30 minutes for some nichel?

Differently from Odyssey you don't feel the character progression.
There are so few armour set, so few weapons, and you don't feel the character progression.

I'm an AC fanboy, I played all the games launch day since the first AC but this game is so flat when compared to Odyssey and a big disappointment for me.

I'm at 60 hours now and I changed my mind since the original post.

Valhalla is not on par with Odyssey, Odyssey landscapes are way better, I like the history in Odyssey (that is absent in Valhalla), Valhalla have no "Historical Figures" like in Odyssey but all in all is a good game.
I'm enjoying it, after the first hours, the gameplay is improved with skills and abilities, I think that if you liked Odyssey, you should play Valhalla.

I'm at 50 hours of Valhalla, played 150 hours in Odyssey, I really would like to go straight to the end, the game is boring.
Valhalla is a huge step back over Odyssey.

It's a 100+hours game without RPG mechanincs and without the mighty architectures and landscapes we are used in the AC series.
Sincerely in 50 hours I don't even encountered some impactful characters like in Odyssey, Odyssey was full of impactful characters and more history rich.

I really hope that the next AC will be made from the same people of Odyssey, Valhallha I repeat, is a huge step back.

@asgardian02 they tried to remove all the RPG things that made Valhalla so great.
No need to argue on tastes, I can understand that there are people who prefer a game more RPG oriented and people who prefer a game that is less RPG oriented.

But why do a game that is so long, with so many points of the map if this game is not an RPG at all,
how do you justify 100+ hours if there is no character progession?

@imaginaryruins I don't get your point, should we compare Valhalla to the original AC game?
Do you know that AC1 born in 2007?
What's your point?

there is no real reasons why to explore all the points on the map since the map is all the same, all countryside xD
I loved Odyssey, I think that it is the AC I loved more since AC2, surely the most funny to play,
Valhalla is no where near to Odyssey in pretty every aspects.

As title.
I feel that Valhalla is way worse than Odyssey in pretty everything.

Landscapes are all the same, ok we are talking about an historical period where there are only countryside,
but what about Asgard?

Asgard is so "lifeless" when compared to the Atlantis of Odyssey.

Combat system is so boring when compared to Odyssey,
ax, perry, ax, repeat.

Skill tree is a caos, abilities can't be mixed in a combo like in Odyssey and you end using always the same abilities.
I used one or two at most during combat.

Too much things on the map, it happen that you spend 30 minutes finding a point on the map and you end finding some pieces of nichel, seriously?
30 minutes for some nichel?

Differently from Odyssey you don't feel the character progression.
There are so few armour set, so few weapons, and you don't feel the character progression.

I'm an AC fanboy, I played all the games launch day since the first AC but this game is so flat when compared to Odyssey and a big disappointment for me.

As title.
As soon as I start Valhalla I get this error: "uplay can't sync achievements"

what can I do?